December 8, 2015
I blame super slow instant replay for all the moaning about sport officiating. Argument done. I wish it were this easy to dismiss the squabbling about calls. There has always been referee and umpire lambasting, but the complaints are reaching unprecedented levels of scrutiny. Not only are officials, refs, umpires, and judges publicly shamed and targeted, they are also getting caught up in physical skirmishes. Once I was umpiring a Little League game, and I had missed a call on the bases. I decided based on what I saw at the time and was soon criticized by both the Manager and the fans in an intimidating way; I was fifteen years old. I learned from my mistake, but I also found that emotions can run deep, even supposedly in a game for fun.
Let's look at the possible reasons for the heightened and sometimes shrill judgments of sport officiating; Not enough training, no full-time officials, rules are becoming more muddled with too many interpretations, technology can see more than the naked eye, and biased treatment for certain athletes.
Education is an obvious culprit, which is also the number one reason for any poor job performance. You are only as good as what you study, what you practice, and how often you utilize your skills. Being a game official takes years to become proficient at knowing all the nuances, and when the smaller level of training gets exposed in a situation, there is the chance for mistakes. How often do you hear the term "rookie official" being utilized in a television broadcast? The commentators are setting up the viewers just in case wrong calls are made, establishing a scapegoat.
When it comes to football at the collegiate and professional level, you are getting officials who are part-time employees who might be selling vacuum cleaners during the week. Nothing terrible with hawking vacuums, but it's better to be selling something that sucks than sucking at your blown calls in front of eighty thousand people. Football is so popular and full of big-time money and emotion. Why they don't hire a dedicated full-time group of officials baffles me. A couple of beer commercials could pay for an entire team of full-time refs for one weekend in the NFL. You would think you would get more consistent officiating across the board with an experienced and well-trained staff.
The rule books for any of the professional sports contain pages of new infractions and interpretations. The problem with this factor is the officials who might understand the rules, but not everybody is on the same page. One year you touch another athlete in a certain way; the next, you can't breathe on him. The NFL is going down some slippery slopes to understand pass interference, holding, and tackling. The games are getting messy with flags being thrown from everybody, refs, coaches, and second-guessing from the replay booths, announcers, and experts; it is sometimes unwatchable. I don't know where the NFL is going with their rulings, but it appears that rules need simplifying instead of regulating all modes of contact. This goes as well for basketball because I believe the calls are inconsistent from play to play more than any other sport.
Of course, we have what I view as the elephant in the room, and technology is better than the human eye. Officials can only comprehend so much at full speed; therefore, the games are being constantly slowed down to a snail pace to review the calls in some remote location. I feel camera technology hasn’t improved anything to these contests except make them more controversial and slower. I think baseball at this point should have an electronic umpire behind home plate. If every pitch is going to be scrutinized anyway, why not use the digital eye. Football calls are the most difficult to watch for refs, and the camera proves it, but I fear the day when every call gets reviewed only to please one of the teams. Where does this end?
Lastly, every sports fan watching thinks the star athletes receive preferential treatment when it comes to penalties. Older players get fewer calls than younger ones, and some teams are more penalized than others. The unions of officials will deny the accusation, but it appears evident to most of us who logged hours in front of the TV. This is the most forgiving of the officiating sins, but not when it comes to big money playoffs.
More and more sports are available for people to play, which results in a growing employment field of officiating. I fear that a shortage of officials, well-trained and experienced ones will occur. The answer to the shortfall can open the path for more electronic judging. It doesn't appear that camera technology is going away, so where is the happy medium between the human eye and the electronic one? College football replays are as annoying as the NFL, so there must be a place where the two can operate in cohesion instead of the second-guessing nature. I am sure that a day will come, the eye in the sky will replace professional level, on-field, court referees, and all the officials will be sitting in the command center. Urgh...